Common Core SUMMARY
Endorsed by the University of California, the California State University system and California Community Colleges, the common core state standards outline what students should know and be able to do in English language arts and mathematics from kindergarten through the 12th grade.
These standards are aligned with the knowledge and skills identified as critical for college and career success, are benchmarked to the standards of the world’s top-performing countries, and mark the first time that states have shared a common set of expectations for the nation’s K-12 students.
Learn how the common core was developed, and explore further online.
the common core classroom
With the implementation of common core, critical thinking, project based hands-on activities, and student to student and student to teacher collaboration will be much more prevalent. In language arts students will see a shift toward nonfiction texts and argumentative writing. Integration of technology into the curriculum to transform student learning will be a key focus. Writing will be shared with outside audiences and next-generation assessments will evaluate higher order processes.
Math classes will teach fewer concepts, but they will reach new depths in exploring those concepts. Students will be challenged with more real-world applications and fewer theoretical equations, and there will be a greater emphasis on deeper conceptual learning and alternative pathways to a correct answer rather than merely providing the correct answer.
our strategic plan and Common Core
Upland Unified School District's strategic plan creates a strong focus on successful implementation of common core and key strategies that are monitored and updated every six months through our strategic planning process. Our strategies focus on district alignment in decision making and collaboration, technology integration, professional development, and priority practices that support rigor in our implementation.
If you review UUSD’s strategic plan alongside the new standards, you will see a number of similarities, and that’s why we are eager to embrace common core. We are already heading this direction. Implementing these standards strengthens our efforts to bring focus and clarity to instruction while improving our students’ ability to engage with rigorous content and demonstrate capacities that are critical for success in the 21st century.
assessments in the age of common core
In October 2013, Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation to replace the state’s old standardized testing system with more modern, computer-based assessments aligned with the common core standards.
Authored by assemblywoman Susan A. Bonilla, D-Concord, the law directed school districts to begin transitioning to the new California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) assessments, which were administered during the 2014-15 school year. The new exams, developed by the smarter balanced assessment consortium, will feature computer-adaptive technology that can adjust questions based on previous right or wrong answers, providing much more precise feedback to indicate which skills and content areas have been mastered. Like the common core itself, the assessments will focus more on critical-thinking, reasoning, and problem solving.
more facts about common core
Though there are a number of online resources with helpful information about the common core, some rumors and myths persist. Here are a few facts to keep in mind:
States developed these standards. The nation’s governors and state education commissioners spearheaded common core development to provide clear and consistent understanding of the reading and math knowledge and skills that students will need as they pursue lifelong learning and success in their careers. Working through their representative organizations, the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers, state leaders collaborated with educators, subject matter experts, and researchers to write and review the standards. The federal government was not involved with the development of the common core standards.
The federal government did not require states to adopt the standards. In fact, four states, Alaska, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia, have chosen not to adopt the standards in either subject, and Minnesota has adopted the English language arts standards but not the math standards. However, the federal government’s Race to the Top grant competition incentivized states to adopt college and career readiness standards, such as common core, by providing state applicants with additional points for doing so. Additionally, the United States Department of Education required states to adopt either the common core standards or another set of reading and math college- and career-ready standards approved by its network of higher education institutions.
The standards are not a curriculum. Standards are targets for what students should know and be able to do. Curricula are the instructional plans and strategies that educators use to help their students reach those expectations. The CCSS are a set of shared goals for the knowledge and skills students should possess in English language arts and mathematics to be proficient in those subjects. As such, districts and schools should use the standards as a basis for developing their own curricula by designing course content, choosing appropriate instructional strategies, developing learning activities, continuously gauging student understanding, and adjusting instruction accordingly.
California’s four systems of higher education have endorsed the common core standards. The University of California, California State University, California Community Colleges, and the Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities are engaging in a comprehensive, coordinated approach for implementation to link the K-12 system with higher education on standards, assessments, and teacher training.
Common core does not relinquish local control. School boards remain responsible for setting their own visions and executing their own unique approaches for instruction and curriculum. In addition, districts and schools will continue to choose their own textbooks and instructional materials, provide teachers with tailored professional development and design supports and interventions to help students reach proficiency. School districts have always abided by state-approved education standards. At the same time, districts have maintained the flexibility and responsibility to implement the state-approved standards in a manner that reflects the needs of their communities. Even with the implementation of common core, educators and local communities will continue to make decisions about what happens in their districts, schools, and classrooms.